Désolé de vous embêter encore une fois. Mais cette fois-ci, je post deux petits textes à propos d'un sujet que je trouve assez intéressant:'L'abstinence ou le port du préservatif?'.
Le premier texte est un résumé à propos d'un article du "Times" et le second est un commentaire sur les récents propos du pape sur le port du préservatif.
J'espère qu'une âme charitable pourra encore une fois m'aider pour la correction de l'orthographe et de la tournure de mes phrases .
Kiss ^^
Summary: During his first trip in Africa, where the amount of Catholics is sharply rising, the pope said that distribution of condoms was not the solution to the Aids epidemic,but it aggravates this problem.
The Vatican says that sexual abstinence is the only sure solution to protect everyone from this disease.
Moreover, this epidemic affects not only people’s health, but also affects their social life and the African’s economy.
The Vatican health minister, who is a cardinal, says that condoms can be exceptionally used. For example, by married women and men who are affected by the Aids
The Vatican wants to ban condoms because spermatozoon can pass through small holes which are present on its surface. So people are exposed to risks because HIV viruses are smaller than spermatozoon. The Vatican thinks that it is dangerous to use condoms and it should be written on condoms, like it is done for cigarettes.
However the World Health Organization affirms that the Vatican’s statements are incorrect, because condoms really reduce risks of infection.
Comments: The pope thinks that abstinence is the only safe way of being Aids free, but I think that a lifelong chastity enables the pope to understand the needs, emotions, sensations and pleasures expressed in sex.
Moreover, even if you don’t have sex, you can be affected. For example, people who work in the medical field are exposed to risks even when precautions are taken.
I think that the pope shout be campaigning to improve the quality of condoms, rather than protesting against them. Condoms are no 100% safe but it is better to use them than using no protections.
Finally, I would like to say that condoms are not the problem in Africa. The real problem is that a lot of women are raped. So, Aids can easily be transmitted.
For me, the only solution is to educate the young. And thanks to the internet, more and more progresses are done.
Désolé de vous embêter encore une fois. Mais cette fois-ci, je post deux petits textes à propos d'un sujet que je trouve assez intéressant:'L'abstinence ou le port du préservatif?'.
Le premier texte est un résumé à propos d'un article du "Times" et le second est un commentaire sur les récents propos du pape sur le port du préservatif.
J'espère qu'une âme charitable pourra encore une fois m'aider pour la correction de l'orthographe et de la tournure de mes phrases .
Kiss ^^
Summary: During his first trip in Africa, where the amount of Catholics is rising sharply , the pope said that distribution of condoms was not the solution to the Aids epidemic,but it aggravates this problem.
The Vatican says that sexual abstinence is the only true solution to protect everyone from this disease.
Moreover, this epidemic affects not only people’s health, but also affects their social life and the African economy.
The Vatican health minister, who is a cardinal, says that condoms can be used exceptionally . For example, by married women and men who are affected by the Aids
The Vatican wants to ban condoms because spermatozoon can pass through small holes which are present on its surface. So people are exposed to risks because HIV viruses are smaller than spermatozoon. The Vatican thinks that it is dangerous to use condoms and it should be written on condoms, like it is done for cigarettes.
However the World Health Organization affirms that the Vatican’s statements are incorrect, because condoms really reduce risks of infection.
Comments: The pope thinks that abstinence is the only safe way of being Aids free, but I think that a lifelong chastity enables the pope to understand the needs, emotions, sensations and pleasures expressed in sex.(1)
Moreover, even if you don’t have sex, you can be affected. For example, people who work in the medical field are exposed to risks even when precautions are taken.
I think that the pope shout be campaigning to improve the quality of condoms, rather than protesting against them. Condoms are not 100% safe but it is better to use them than using no protections.
Finally, I would like to say that condoms are not the problem in Africa. The real problem is that a lot of women are raped. So, Aids can easily be transmitted.
For me, the only solution is to educate the young. And thanks to the internet, more and more progresses are done.
(1) traduction: "grace a une vie de chastete le pape peux comprendre les besoins, emotions et le plaisirs exprimes lors d'actes sexuels".
Je suis pas sur, je pense que justement il ne les comprend pas. Apres si c'est bien le sens voulu, la phrase est correcte grammaticalement.
Et autre point sur ta derniere phrase: tu parles du continent africain et ensuite de la prevention contre le SIDA grace a Internet.
La encore c'est correct sur la forme, mais Internet n'est pas encore le moyen de communication le plus present en Afrique
Ils ont deja a peine de quoi se nourrir dans certaines regions...
Lol merci encore une fois de ton aide .
Pour la phrase consernant la chasteté. Dans ma tête "enable" sa voulait dire : ne pas comprendre... Parce oui, sinon la phrase n'est pas trop logique .
Et je vais revoir la dernière phrase avec l'internet, pour améliorer tout sa.
Vous allez répondre sur un sujet resté inactif pendant plus de 6 mois. Assurez-vous d'apporter des éléments nouveaux à la discussion avant de poursuivre.